Tuesday, December 29, 2009

Pictures - Natural Looking HDR Pics



This entry summarizes the recent activity with HDR photography. Following some information items and recommendations.
.
First, the last milestone of this activity is natural looking, HDR processed pictures. The picture above is considered difficult to handle, due to the heavy contrast. In addition, the trees are back light by the sun (See the shadows direction). The HDR process maintained the fine details. It also preserved their color.
.
The full gallery, based on the same pictures of Tel-aviv and Jaffa is located in:
.
.
Some points to consider:
.
1. The process was done with both Photoshop (CS3 and up) and Photomatix. The later, Photomatix, is recommended. It is cheaper, easier to use, provides some process options and any parameter can be user controlled. Photomatix has also better registration capability of the pictures.
.
2. The source pictures are based on -1, 0 and +1 EV compensation.
.
3. HDR processing options: Here, Tone Mapping with default setting was used. It gives natural looking output. Pictures are looking more of the way our eyes work. In the previous entry ("Pictures - HDR Pics Of Tel-Aviv and Jaffa"), the "Grunge" option was used. It generates a more artistic looking, colorful output.
.
4. The HDR process is not suitable for action shots. The whole scene should be static, without any movement during capture.
.
5. There is only a small difference between a true HDR process (Working with at least 3 differently compensated pictures) and simulation mode (Working out of a single picture !!!). The later is only possible with Photomatix.
.
Bottom line - due to the restriction of item "4" the HDR process can not be a default picture taking method. It is best with scenic subjects. The HDR processing options and the detailed setting is up to the user preferences - It is the artistic part of the game here.

Thursday, December 24, 2009

Pictures - HDR Pics Of Tel-Aviv and Jaffa



More HDR pictures of Tel-Aviv and Jaffa. This time, a real HDR process was performed. The generated images are cleaner with lower noise inside.
.
Location:
.
.

Sunday, December 20, 2009

Pictures - Paris with High Dynamic Range





HDR (High Dynamic Range) is a photographic technique trying to overcome the limited dynamic range of digital imaging devices (Cameras...).
.
A simulation of the process was performed over selection of pictures shot recently in Paris. The generated output shows many details lost in highlights and shadows. The color cast is muted and slightly shifted, looking more artistic then realistic. It seems that night shots are less suitable for this process due to their extensive deep shadows which translated into noise.
.
Location:
.
http://picasaweb.google.com/gilshamiralbum/ParisHighDynamicRange
.
The original pictures, for comparison, are located in:
.
http://picasaweb.google.com/gilshamir60/Paris102009Selection
.

Friday, December 18, 2009

Pictures - "Color Inside" Album



New album of images where the subject is differentiated from the background by color. The background is muted into Black and white and blurred.
.
Based on real pictures, processed with Photoshop.
.
Location:
.
http://picasaweb.google.com/gilshamiralbum/ColorInside

Saturday, December 12, 2009

Cameras - Nikon's Advanced Amateur Kit

Second chapter of the kit recommendation series. It is advised to read the prefix of the first chapter "Cameras - Canon's Advanced Amateur Kit".
.
Nikon is suggesting two body options for the advanced amateur photographer: D90 and D300s. From image quality aspect, both will get you very good image quality and relatively low noise, including high ISO. Major difference is the maximum FPS, which is higher for the D300s (Not talking about the pricing difference). Here, as with Canon, the photographer should decide how advanced he/she is. The D90 mode wheel provide the amateur oriented modes (Portrait, Landscape, Close-up, Sports...) while missing on the D300s (Assuming you know by yourself how to set the camera for each profile).



Three choices are avaiable for the prime zoom lens, spanning the range of quality and wide view up to convenience. The first choice is the wider 16-85mm providing 24-130mm coverage, image stabilized.


Next is the 18-105mm, slightly less wide but with extra moderate telephoto - translating to 28-150mm. Again, as with all suggested lenses, image stabilized.


 


Last prime zoom lens option is the 18-200mm, one lens doing all.


 


The telephoto zoom lens is 70-300mm (Exact model is AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G IF-ED - the image stabilized VR version !!!!). The viewing angle is translated to impressive 105-450mm.

Speedlight is the second from range top SB-800.





Friday, December 11, 2009

Pictures - Human Rights Day March



This time, Panasonic FZ28 was used. Generally, it performed well. I could benefit from the zoom range: wide angle pictures along with far reached telephoto pictures. Exposure was good, where the camera exposed correctly subjects and throw out any background. Face detection was activated all time and assist setting the focus correctly. Some artifacts occurred when shooting with the sun - lens hood was not used. Auto focus was fast on wide angle and slower on telephoto.

.

Selection was added to:
.
http://picasaweb.google.com/gilshamiralbum/People

Tuesday, December 8, 2009

Music Production - Synthesizers History




This section is written for the good old days: I was lucky to follow closely this industry when some amazing technologies were first introduced. It is not that new technologies are missing today, they are more of evolutions, not revolutions. The text below is not intended to cover every fine detail or instrument - I suggest referring to Wikipedia and other sites for this matter.
.
Being a "home" musical player (you may say amateur...) I was always looked for new sounds. Keyboards, more then any other musical instrument can produce the sounds... you will see how.
.
My first encounter with keyboards was with electric organs. In today's standards, they were primitive instruments: Based on analog oscillators, hard connected and produced sounds based on sinus oscillators. They sounded as variations of flutes, simply because flute is producing a sinus like waveform. Some classic names and sounds from this era are still with us - The Hammond organs and sounds as "Rock Organ" and "Jazz Organ".
.
The first synthesizer, I was aware of, was Moog. It used the same concept of analog oscillators, but, control dials and switches, located on the front panel, tweaked sounds. This configuration enabled more synthetic sounds to be generated. It actually started a trend in the music production industry, where every arranger who wished to be considered modern, used those synthetic, unnatural sounds. New world of sounds for those days was possible. They had a limited character and mostly were non musical by today's standards.
.
While Moog looked like a laboratory tool, there were others that started to look like today's musical keyboard: A portable keyboard with controls located nearby - Enabled real time, on performance sound changes (musician could be more expressive). Prophet and Roland's Jupiter-4 are the most significant and popular ones. They were polyphonic (Compared to Moog's usually monophonic sounds). Roland's tones, thick and with harmony generated by multi oscillators that performed together are still classic today. All was good, but they were all analog. Means, their generated tones were limited to the amount of hardware (Oscillators and filters) put inside.
.
The Yamaha DX7 of the 80's started the revolution. It was a digital synthesizer, the first compact and affordable one. Able to produce sounds of various and completely different nature instruments. Some of the sounds acted much like the originals and new sounds, never heard before started to appear. The secret of this richness and completeness was the first utilization of DSP which backed by SW control. This was the first time that the HW was running user algorithms (or sound schemes). The HW was generic, so, it impose no limitation on the sound generation. The algorithms set the way the virtual oscillators were configured. The sound possiblities, this way, was a huge range. From simple organ like sounds (where the algorithm set the oscillators to work in parallel) to complex waveforms as piano and trumpet (where the algorithm set one oscillator modulating its successor). The method is known as FM synthesis. The DX7's picture is starting this section. One note - The FM synthesis was not simple to utilize for musician. They understood easily the analog synthesis, were the building blocks were simple. It was difficult and non intuitive to create new sound using FM synthesis. Luckily, Yamaha build into the DX7 a port that accepted memory modules with pre-configured sounds. It actually saved the DX7 from being a failure to become a great success. From now on, musical keyboard manufactures provided extensive sound presets along with fine detailed parameter controls.
.
Other companies, as Roland and Korg had their own digital synthesis methods. They enable, As Yamaha's FM system, a large sounds set and continue the trend of SW controlled sound generation, running on generic DSP engines.
.
The target of producing indistinguishable sounds compared with the real musical instruments had to continue. The best synthesizers were good, but, not up to the real world sounds. Memory modules became cheaper those days, which enabled musical keyboards with a huge amount of memory - The sample playback keyboards, or simply, samplers. They were loaded with real musical instruments waveforms, sampled at high resolution and further closed the gap between the real world sounds and the virtual ones. Large waveform libraries generated and create the option of playing anything that could be recorded. This was beyond imagination and musician started the ethnic trend (New Age music) that used tools that otherwise impossible to synthesis. Of course, using a digital sound generators enabled them to create complex arrangements which are more interesting then just a playback. It should be note that not everything was perfect. While synthesizers could act dynamically, changing the generated waveform on the fly, samplers were limited to what recorded. Tools as Piano which acts dynamically suffered mostly. Only later generations could handle this issue - See next paragraphs.
.
The computing industry made a great progress since the DSP's used by the first digital synthesizers. They were much powerful and faster. They could be used to simulate things in real time - here comes the physical modeling. It should be remembered that we were still in the race of producing, synthetically, the true, real sounds. With physical modeling, every instrument was constructed of two sections: A resonator producing the sounds and a wave guide or a modulator which gave the sound its behaviour or character. For example, the hammer is the resonator of the piano while its wooden box producing the sounds, using the waves reflecting off the walls and interacting between themselves. The DSP's should be very fast to do everything in real time, as the player is hitting the Piano's keyboard. Any real musical instrument was accurately produced this way, while new combinations were possible. I was greatly disappointed to see that this concept was not become the synthesis method of choice - Maybe musicians wanted something simpler, intuitive with just sound presets to work with.
.
So, where are we standing today. We are more mature. There are not any revolutions in the recent years, but evolutions. It may be said that modern synthesizers (Music production tool - see the Yamaha MOTIF below) have today something of everything. They are using digital synthesis - means you have virtual oscillators and filters. They are being fed with complex, memory resident, waveforms. So, we the best of two worlds - The complex waveforms of the samplers with the real time dynamics of the digital synthesizers. It can be a simple alternative to the more resource demanding physical modeling. It is worth mention that musical keyboards today have an integral effects DSP's which used to add depth and other powerful effects to the sounds. Some of the keyboards are even customize to produce classical vintage sounds. They are usually referred as Analog modeling and used to produce the early days analog synthesizer sounds.
.
Along this story, I refer to keyboards, but, there is higher level of discussion. Every module I wrote about is available as a stand alone rack mounted box. It can be controlled by the MIDI interface. So, even guitar and wind instrument players can produce new sounds, not associated with their standard instruments... A different story.

Cameras - Canon's Advanced Amateur Kit

Camera kit selection is a major decision facing photographers, starters, as well as experienced who want to upgrade their kit. In this series of recommended camera and lenses kit, I will dedicate separate sections for advanced amateurs and amateurs with pro attitude (explaining later the difference). My recommendation will be based on a single manufacturer's kit - The camera body and the lenses will be of the same manufacture. Started with Canon, I will continue with Nikon and Sony.
.
Advanced amateur photographers are defined by me as photographers who simply enjoy photographic challenges. They are one level above photographers who use their kit just for documentation (Family, vacations...). The difference is translated into equipment needed and money, willing to put. In this respect, amateurs with pro attitude, will probably put the extra money to get extra something. This scale of 4 levels (top are the pro photographers, making their living using their kit), is well known to the manufactures, who try to provide equipment categorized in accordance.
.
The kit will be the basic, essential, based on 4 items: Camera body, standard zoom lens, telephoto zoom lens and a flashgun. Other lenses can be added to enable handling of more photographic challenges (Or handling some items better). Only zoom lenses are suggested here due to their convenience.
.
Starting with the body, Canon 7D is the body of choice for the advanced amature. Note: There is nothing wrong with the lower level Rebel camera (T1i or 500D). It will do most of what the 7D is doing and the differences for the advanced amature will be minor. The biggest operational difference is the continues frame rate (8 fps vs 3 fps). The resolution difference is minor (18 Mp vs 15 Mp). There are differences are in other territories: The user experience and the public relations. The 7D, I have to admit, feels better in the hand then the Rebel. It is more solid, better build (less plastic feeling) and makes you love holding it. The other item will be important to some of us: going public, meeting other photographers, you would not like anybody to think you are not serious about your hobby. You probably would not want to be caught with "entry level" DSLR. So, you get the higher level, the 7D...
.
Before going to lenses, the camera operation options should be double check. Setting a single digit model name (7D) rather two digits name (Like 50D) meaning it is more of 5D, rather then 50D. This similarity is carried to the modes wheel. Shooting modes as Portrait, Landscape, Close-up, Sports and Night portrait are missing here. It is up to the user to decide how advanced he/she is. If required, the 50D is still available.



Two choices suggested for the standard zoom. They are based on quality versus one lens doing all. The best choice, for advanced amateur is the new Canon 15-85mm zoom lens. It provides a range from wide (24mm) to moderate tele (130mm). It is suitable for any standard shooting situation and minimizing the need to switch lenses. No need to mention that it is image stabilized which is mandatory for any lens today. Note that higher grade lenses, as "L" series lenses or lenses with larger aperture (F2.8) will be suggested to the higher level photographer, the amateur with pro attitude (Due mostly to higher prices).


The Canon 18-200mm zoom lens is a choice for photographers who like to travel light and do not want to switch lenses at all. The lens provides a range of 28-300mm, so, you can live well with it. The price - lower quality. The pictures will be of lower sharpness, especially at the image edges.

The telephoto zoom lens will be the Canon image stabilized 70-300mm, getting effective range of 105-450mm. The lens is located in the optimal place of price performance in Canon's telephoto zoom lens line.


The speedlight 430EX-II is second from the top and providing enough power for advanced amateur needs. It is fully compatible with Canon's latest E-TTL II technology.

Monday, December 7, 2009

Cameras - New Standard Zoom Lens Option




The new Sigma 17-70mm F2.8-4 DC MACRO OS HSM lens is the latest version of lens started as 28-105mm F2.8-4. New in this edition is the optical stabilizer. This lens, designed for APS-C size sensors, providing a larger aperture at its wide end (F2.8). It is unique in this standard zoom class, providing F2.8 at affordable price. Other alternatives, for comparison, are fixed F2.8 zoom lenses that considered professional (And have a price tag to match). Here, the larger F2.8 aperture is available only at its wider end, limited its usage (Low light and night shots) to mostly scenic subjects.
.
Bottom line, it is a good alternative to the standard zoom kit lenses provided by camera manufactures.

Sunday, December 6, 2009

Cars - Mazda 6 Comments


Following are some remarks of the latest Mazda 6, based on one year driving experience:
.
[+] Great engine, transmission and their integration.
[+] Very nice styling, reminding Lexus cars.
[+] Positive feeling inside.
[+] A driver's car - great acceleration, stability and get you a confidence it can do anything.
.
[-] Rides like a road roller (See picture). The suspension acts as welded. Every small bump is transmitted inside. "Car & Driver" magazine defined such ride as "severe".
.
If your hobby is not road construction, I suggest look elsewhere - Try Toyota Avensis or Subaru Legacy (B4).

Saturday, December 5, 2009

Pictures - Portrait Drawings


Portrait drawings were uploaded to the following link:
.
.
All based on pictures and were created using digital art SW.
.

Friday, December 4, 2009

Cameras - Minolta History

Back in the film days, Minolta was a leader in SLR cameras. Their cameras, introduced from 1985 until 2001, brought innovation, technologies and new operation concepts. There was nothing wrong with the other manufactures, as Canon and Nikon, but Minolta was the first in many cases. It is interesting to see how modern SLR's, their features and operation concepts were evolved. Reviewing Minolta SLR cameras, through their generations, will show concepts that adopted and others that eventually dropped. It can be a good case study for electronic equipment operation concepts.



Minolta 7000 introduced in 1985 was the first to have a successful body integral AF system. The AF mechanism (sensors and motor) was inside the body. It was driving new AF lenses using a mechanical shaft. The whole system (camera and lenses) were in the same size as non AF SLR cameras - A major depart from earlier attempts. Variations of this concept is still used today by modern DSLR's. It is worth mention that SLR cameras were already used AE systems, so, photographers have the first time a fully automatic SLR camera - They could concentrate on the subject and the composition instead of the technical aspects.
.
Another newcomer introduced in this camera was the operation concept. Rather then dials used until this camera arrival (controlling ISO, exposure and other options), Minolta used a more modern LCD panel and push buttons. To set a parameter, its push button was used and the value modified using "+/-" controls. The LCD and the controls made the camera looked "computerized", which was very popular. Also, it was the first attempt to control many parameters where only limited place was provided to controls. Later Minolta cameras will show how this concept was evolved.


Second generation Minolta AF SLR, the 7000i, was introduced in 1988. This camera, as its model number denotes, is more as refinement of the basic 7000 model. The AF system was improved: It is using now 3 sensors, instead of a single sensor in the 7000. The active AF area was enlarged. In addition, a predictive AF was introduced to handle fast moving subjects - It could predict, based on the recorded movement, where the subject will be in the next frame (and adjust the AF faster). The 3 sensors, arranged in "H" pattern could handle subjects with both horizontal and vertical patterns. AF sensors arrangement and more important, the information they provide of the subject is still an issue in modern DSLR cameras.
.
Looking at the 7000i, some changes were made for operation ease. The LCD was tilted for a better viewing. The parameters selection bottoms, on the left side were enlarged and less frequent parameter bottoms were moved aside. Most important, a large "P" bottom was added. It resets the camera to the basic, fully automatic operation mode, whenever pushed (Overriding any user setting). Through the new bottom configuration and the "P" (Panic ?!?) bottom, Minolta can teach us something: When fast operation of a tool is required, the bottoms should be easily reached, large enough to be seen and pushed. More important, there should be an easy way to recover from any setting to the basic one.
.
Minolta was the first to recognized the need to customize the camera for shooting profiles: Scenic, sports, portrait, macro and others. It was clear that only professional photographers were able to do so. Dedicated cards, per desired profile, were used to program the camera. It was a first attempt to enable users handle easily photographic situations. Later, Canon implemented this concept better by providing it on a circular dial.
.
Another new tenancy is this market was the introduction of a new standard lens with each camera generation. This lens had always something remarkable for its users. In this case, Minolta introduced the 35-105mm zoom lens. It was almost the same size as the regular 35-70mm zoom lenses of those days, but, provided an extra range.


The Minolta 7xi was introduced in 1992 and was Minolta's ambitious attempt to introduce a second revolution in the SLR market (The first was the AF system). It was failed. Auto zoom function was integrated into this camera, based on AF distance measurement and the shooting profile, the camera automatically adjusted the zoom. For example, when shooting a portrait, the camera zooms automatically to frame the head and shoulders. The objective was to have a fully automatic SLR camera - no need to frame. This objective "killed" the camera. SLR users, in opposed to compact camera users, eventually wanted to be in control. To work with their camera and have the option to tweak its operation. Fully automatic camera, of this automation degree was too much! . Also, emerged good designs from Canon and Nikon were starting to "close" the gap. To gain some more marketing experience, it is suggested to look at the camera clean lines and omission of bottuns - Users did not have "toys" to play with.
.
There was a good staff inside. More AF sensors, predictive AF which could track acceleration and "U" shape movement and integration between the AF and AE systems
.
Keeping the tradition of new lens introduction with a new camera, Minolta introduced a new standard zoom lens: 28-105mm. The first to provide 28mm wide as standard.
Minolta learned their lesson - The 700si returned to the basic. Introduced in 1993, fast enough, trying to recover Minolta's position. There was nothing special in this camera regarding innovation. It was actually implemented successfully all Minolta concepts (Without the non popular auto zoom). It can be considered the best film SLR camera of Minolta: fast AF system, Honycomb metering system and most important, a well designed user interface. This design was still based on the LCD, but many bottoms were positioned on easy to operate locations. It was a clear photographer tool. Minolta will continue with this attitude in the next model.
.
The introduced lens now was another first: 24-85mm. This range, first by Minolta, is considered the best travel lens, or, as one told me "I would buy this camera only because of its lens".


Minolta 7 was the last film SLR of Minolta. It was introduced in 2001. When introduced, we were already in the digital age and there was a question of its relevancy. The camera design shows a complete design cycle for Minolta. All controls are using now dials. The concept here is a dedicated dial per parameter. No need for multi bottom pushes to set a value. More important, the camera setup status is clearly visible. This design, gained through the years is considered to be the best control concept. Actually, today's computerized equipment, in many cases, is using a graphical control dials on their screen to have easy and intuitive operation.
.
The Minolta 7 design was further used by Minolta's first DSLR, the 7D - Another story, later.
.
Looking at Minolta's history, one is wondering why was it gone. It was not because mistakes described here. It was due to Honeywell AF patent infringing (Which costs Minolta a lot of money) and the late arrival of its first DSLR (Due to technical problems with the image stabilizer - yet another story)... not forgetting Canon and Nikon having their own great DSLR's.

Tuesday, December 1, 2009

Watch - Suunto X9i - Recorded Jerusalem Tour


A 15Km walk through some of Jerusalem's major sites was recorded with Suunto X9i. The tour started and finished in Jerusalem's Malha railway station (Got to Jerusalem by train, this time). Later, Mahane-Yehuda market, west city center, old city and the Western Wall were visited.
.
Above is the recorded path, as exported to Google Earth.
.
Pictures are in the following links (Including pictures taken from the train - Sorry of the sometime dirty glass).
.
.
The Suunto X9i was functioning very well in Jerusalem. It was set to record locations in 1 minute intervals.